what is a gift of an animal for slaughter as a way to honor gods.
Why Practise Muslims Slaughter Animals for God?
Muslims around the world are celebrating Eid al-Adha. What are the holiday'due south well-nigh important lessons?
Mr. Akyol is a contributing opinion author who focuses on Islam.
This calendar week, the world's 1.five billion Muslims gloat Eid al-Adha, a four-day banquet that usually includes communal prayer, presents for children and visits to family members and cemeteries. But the key ritual will be what gives the holiday its proper noun: "Adha" means "sacrifice" in Arabic. Most families who can afford to do so will slaughter an brute — perhaps a sheep, goat, cow or camel. The fauna will exist blindfolded, gently put downwards and and then slaughtered while the name of God is praised. The meat is consumed by the family and also distributed to neighbors and to the needy.
For some not-Muslims, it may seem puzzling that Muslims appoint in such a bloody ritual. But Jews and Christians should be able to relate to the holiday's origin: the biblical story of the sacrifice of Isaac.
This story is in both the Book of Genesis and, with some interesting variations, the Quran. In the story, Abraham receives a shocking injunction from God: He must offer his beloved son equally a cede. Equally a devoted servant of God, he agrees to obey and takes the child to Mountain Moriah to slaughter him. At the last moment, God, satisfied with Abraham'southward devotion, saves the male child by sending a ram as a substitute sacrifice.
There are minor differences between how the story is told in Islam and how it'south told in Judaism and Christianity — such as the name of the child, which the Quran doesn't mention and Muslims gradually accepted as Ishmael. But the moral lesson is the same: Abraham's piety should be celebrated. He was willing to obey God'southward gild, even if it meant killing his son.
In the Christian tradition, though, this view encountered a bold challenge during the Enlightenment. Immanuel Kant, the 18th-century German philosopher, criticized Abraham'south bullheaded submission not as an example to emulate but as a failure to avoid. Abraham should have been certain well-nigh his own moral sense, Kant argued, and suspicious about an ostensibly divine voice commanding him to exercise something as savage equally sacrificing his son. Kant wasn't advocating defying God, necessarily, merely he was empowering human reason.
The Muslim world at large has non had its own Enlightenment, but that doesn't mean Muslims never developed similar ideas. Medieval Islam had its own rationalists who also took an unorthodox position on the sacrifice story for the aforementioned reason Kant did: They could not accept that God would have ordered something then fell.
These were the Mu'tazilites , members of a theological school that flourished in Iraq around the 9th century, which argued that "adept" and "bad" were defined not but past divine verdicts, as their rivals claimed, just also human reason. For instance, murder wasn't bad simply because God told humans so — information technology was objectively bad. Moreover, God would never do, or club people to practise, something that is bad. So, they reasoned, Abraham could not really accept been commanded to carry out child sacrifice.
Image
This view was further articulated by Ibn Arabi, a Sufi master from medieval Spain, who highlighted an important nuance in the Quranic version of the story. Different the Bible, in which Abraham receives an explicit commandment from God to sacrifice Isaac, the Abraham of the Quran only has a dream in which he sees himself sacrificing his son. He and so consults his son, and they together decide that this is a commandment from God. Only this was a wrong interpretation, Ibn Arabi argued, and by sending a sacrificial ram at the last moment, "his Lord rescued his son from Abraham'due south misapprehension."
If this accept on the sacrifice story is true, so the lesson for Muslims is that they should be cautious about obeying what seems to exist the volition of God and compare religious commandments with their moral sense. This is particularly true for ordinary mortals like the states, who learn religious commandments not from direct revelations, as the prophets do, only rather from the transmissions and interpretations of fallible men. Our guide should be not blind obedience, in other words, but reasoned deliberation.
In that location'due south another lesson to keep in mind this Eid al-Adha: The centrality of the sacrifice story in Islam is a reminder of how Islam is a deeply and literally Abrahamic religion. That is why Muslims are going through the same theological conundrums that Jews and Christians have as well discussed throughout their histories. And that is why, in the next few days, hundreds of millions of Muslims will honor Abraham with their sacrifices. "Oh our God," they will also say during their daily prayers, "bless us as you blessed Abraham, and the family of Abraham."
Mustafa Akyol, a contributing opinion writer, is a senior fellow on Islam and modernity at the Cato Plant and the author, most recently, of "The Islamic Jesus."
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/opinion/eid-al-adha-sacrifice-isaac.html
0 Response to "what is a gift of an animal for slaughter as a way to honor gods."
Postar um comentário